Showing posts with label muslim-american. Show all posts
Showing posts with label muslim-american. Show all posts
Thursday, December 01, 2011
A first step towards thinking about Islam
I cannot help but think of my faith as rationally as possible. Muslims may believe that their book, the Quran, is the word of God and a fitting first principle, but there is enough of man's hand in even that, that I cannot help but consider the even more primary gift given to us by our creator: our minds. We are, philosophy and observation tell us, a consciousness perceiving all else. All existence may well be nothing more than our imagination, but we know for sure that we exist. I think, therefore I am, as Descartes said. If this can be accepted, that our minds are our most primary given, than we must also accept that it is necessarily our greatest tool in perceiving even the divine. If you believe, as I do, before even rationalization, than you know that our minds too must be God given.
Once you accept that, I can begin to make my case...
Labels:
american muslims,
ash meer,
islam,
muslim,
muslim-american,
muslims for peace,
sufiism
Friday, June 18, 2010
Who is the Quran speaking to?
Recently I came across this article: http://www.ahl-alquran.com/English/show_article.php?main_id=5258
where I read the following:
"Then there may be instances of ambiguity in address as well. Sometimes, a verse would apparently address the Prophet (pbuh); however, in reality the address would be directed at the Muslim ummah. Similarly, an apparent address to him would actually be directed at the leadership of the Quraysh or to the People of the Book. Examples of such addresses abound in the Qur'an. Thus it is essential that this differentiation be made with full caution, and it should be fully ascertained as to who is the actual addressee. Without this, the real purport of the Qur'an cannot be grasped.
"Third, general and specific verses should be differentiated. There are many places in the Qur'an where the words are general; however, the context testifies with full certainty that something specific is meant. The Qur'an uses the word (people), but it does not refer to all the people of the world; and many a time they do not even refer to all the people of Arabia: the word refers to a group among them. It uses the expression (on all the religions), and it does not refer to all religions of the world; it refers to (polytheists) but they do not refer to all those who are guilty of polytheism. Similarly, the words (And from these People of the Book) do not refer to all the People of the Book of the world. It mentions the word (man) but it does not refer to mankind."
This is important in understanding the Quran as not only a timeless scripture, but also a record of specific events at a specific time in history. If this is true, then is it all relevant to us? And if some of the Quran is not relevant to us, then how can we see it as a perfect book? How can we think the supreme being would be so lazy.
But I don't see it that way. Think of a classic book, let's say Huck Finn. Does the very important and ALWAYS relevant message that you should treat people equally become less true because the story takes place in the past...? No. And on the other hand, does a reader need to embrace the archaic lifestyle, morals and pastimes of the characters of the story to feel that the message of it speaks to them...? No.
So if we know this to be true: That literature is a powerful way to teach society, an intimate whisper into the heart of a reader, and we know that God is speaking to us through stories and metaphor, both of which are necessary elements of literature, then why can we not see certain parts of the Quran AS literature? Not reportage, not commandments, but actually literature, with all the open endedness and personal interpretation that is suggested by that.
I think even in the Quran, God warns us against taking things to literally... and more importantly he warns us against forcing our interpretation on others:
"Now those whose hearts are given to swerving from the truth go after that part of the divine writ
which has been expressed in allegory, seeking out [what is bound to create] confusion, and seeking [to arrive at] its final meaning [in an arbitrary manner]; but none save God knows its final meaning. Hence, those who are deeply rooted in knowledge say: "We believe in it; the whole [of the divine writ] is from our Sustainer - albeit none takes this to heart save those who are endowed with insight.
(Sorry, I believe in quoting full verse references to avoid misinterpretation.)"
where I read the following:
"Then there may be instances of ambiguity in address as well. Sometimes, a verse would apparently address the Prophet (pbuh); however, in reality the address would be directed at the Muslim ummah. Similarly, an apparent address to him would actually be directed at the leadership of the Quraysh or to the People of the Book. Examples of such addresses abound in the Qur'an. Thus it is essential that this differentiation be made with full caution, and it should be fully ascertained as to who is the actual addressee. Without this, the real purport of the Qur'an cannot be grasped.
"Third, general and specific verses should be differentiated. There are many places in the Qur'an where the words are general; however, the context testifies with full certainty that something specific is meant. The Qur'an uses the word (people), but it does not refer to all the people of the world; and many a time they do not even refer to all the people of Arabia: the word refers to a group among them. It uses the expression (on all the religions), and it does not refer to all religions of the world; it refers to (polytheists) but they do not refer to all those who are guilty of polytheism. Similarly, the words (And from these People of the Book) do not refer to all the People of the Book of the world. It mentions the word (man) but it does not refer to mankind."
This is important in understanding the Quran as not only a timeless scripture, but also a record of specific events at a specific time in history. If this is true, then is it all relevant to us? And if some of the Quran is not relevant to us, then how can we see it as a perfect book? How can we think the supreme being would be so lazy.
But I don't see it that way. Think of a classic book, let's say Huck Finn. Does the very important and ALWAYS relevant message that you should treat people equally become less true because the story takes place in the past...? No. And on the other hand, does a reader need to embrace the archaic lifestyle, morals and pastimes of the characters of the story to feel that the message of it speaks to them...? No.
So if we know this to be true: That literature is a powerful way to teach society, an intimate whisper into the heart of a reader, and we know that God is speaking to us through stories and metaphor, both of which are necessary elements of literature, then why can we not see certain parts of the Quran AS literature? Not reportage, not commandments, but actually literature, with all the open endedness and personal interpretation that is suggested by that.
I think even in the Quran, God warns us against taking things to literally... and more importantly he warns us against forcing our interpretation on others:
"Now those whose hearts are given to swerving from the truth go after that part of the divine writ
which has been expressed in allegory, seeking out [what is bound to create] confusion, and seeking [to arrive at] its final meaning [in an arbitrary manner]; but none save God knows its final meaning. Hence, those who are deeply rooted in knowledge say: "We believe in it; the whole [of the divine writ] is from our Sustainer - albeit none takes this to heart save those who are endowed with insight.
(Sorry, I believe in quoting full verse references to avoid misinterpretation.)"
Labels:
american muslims,
islam,
islamo-facism,
muslim-american,
muslims for peace,
sufiism,
sufism
Sunday, January 18, 2009
Today, I joined my sister and her kids to build some support for her organization, Muslims for Peace. The purpose behind the organization is to show to the world, that there is a majority of Muslims who are peaceful. We set up a table at the MLK day event sponsored by local Brooklyn politician, Kevin Powell. It was very interesting. Very few Muslims there, but as the audience was primarily African American, they were very sympathetic.
Thursday, December 11, 2008
I am a Muslim. I know that saying that invites all kinds of preconceived notions for non-Muslims... I can accept that. In my lifetime, Muslims have generally made a negative impression on non-Muslims, and its to be expected that they would be wary of me. The same as if someone comes up to me and says, "I am a Christian" Its not that I have anything against Christians, but if someone comes out and says it, you wonder why... what is the territory they are trying to own... pro-life? born-again? clean living? and is their point to be expository or exclusionary?
So I can imagine non-muslims going thru the same thought process, but the difficult part of this process is that I don't fit into any of their preconceived notions. I am not foreign, I was born and brought up in the United States, and consider myself American. I am not socially conservative, or anti-semitic, or anti-western. So, then, why describe myself as Muslim? what does it mean to me to be muslim?
Well, first and foremost, I believe it. That's right, as incongruous and unlikely as it may seem, I really truly believe that there is a God, and that he is the God described, as Allah, in the Quran. And before we get into the whole proof of God argument, let me just say, I don't rationally believe it, I have faith in it. And my faith is so strong, and so much a part of me, that it is pretty much unshakeable, come what may.
But that's not why I tell non-Muslims that I am a Muslim. In this country no one really cares what you deeply believe, only how you act upon it. And to all external views, i am no different than any other person of my generation. I don't drink, and I don't eat pork, but that's not so unusual either in this day and age.
For me, I like to tell people I am a Muslim simply to counteract their preconceived notions. To say, "you look at me and make certain assumptions, but you don't guess that I am a Muslim"
Now, an even more tricky situation is telling other Muslims that I am a Muslim.
So I can imagine non-muslims going thru the same thought process, but the difficult part of this process is that I don't fit into any of their preconceived notions. I am not foreign, I was born and brought up in the United States, and consider myself American. I am not socially conservative, or anti-semitic, or anti-western. So, then, why describe myself as Muslim? what does it mean to me to be muslim?
Well, first and foremost, I believe it. That's right, as incongruous and unlikely as it may seem, I really truly believe that there is a God, and that he is the God described, as Allah, in the Quran. And before we get into the whole proof of God argument, let me just say, I don't rationally believe it, I have faith in it. And my faith is so strong, and so much a part of me, that it is pretty much unshakeable, come what may.
But that's not why I tell non-Muslims that I am a Muslim. In this country no one really cares what you deeply believe, only how you act upon it. And to all external views, i am no different than any other person of my generation. I don't drink, and I don't eat pork, but that's not so unusual either in this day and age.
For me, I like to tell people I am a Muslim simply to counteract their preconceived notions. To say, "you look at me and make certain assumptions, but you don't guess that I am a Muslim"
Now, an even more tricky situation is telling other Muslims that I am a Muslim.
Labels:
ash meer,
ashraf,
extremism,
islam,
islamo-facism,
meer,
muslim,
muslim-american
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
